Call us for free on 0800 1777 522
Info Articles

NA Legal

Solicitors for small & medium business.

Guide to Leasing Commercial Premises

A typical commercial lease could be anything from 20-50 pages and contain many thousands of words.  Every single sentence and word put in the lease is there for a specific reason and each has a specific legal technical meaning.  

Even a straightforward lease is a complex and highly technical legal document.  It defines the rights and obligations of both landlord and tenant and once it is signed is set in stone.


Leasing property can be a very costly exercise over the term of the lease.  Not only is there the rent to pay but also business rates and outgoings, the cost of repairs and maintenance and expenses that the landlord is entitled to recover under the lease.

As an example, a relatively modest 10-year lease at an annual rent of £10,000 could end up costing at least £150,000 over the lifetime of the lease.  This compares to the value of a house.  The sheer value and cost of a lease over its term means that it is very important that you know exactly what you are signing up to and that the lease is reasonable and appropriate for the property and your requirements.

Linked to that point is that if during the term of the lease you wanted to sell your business or assign the lease to someone else, if the lease isn’t right then any potential buyer will not want to take it on.  You could therefore find that your business is worthless as there wouldn’t be anyone willing to take it on.

Anatomy of a Typical Lease

Every lease is different.  The areas that a typical lease will cover (although in different ways) are as follows:

1. Parties to the lease.  The landlord and the tenant must be property defined and set out in the lease.  This may sound like an obvious point to make, but where there are limited companies, partnerships and joint owners involved this is not always as straight forward as it may seem.

2. Description of the property.  Again, this seems like an obvious point but it is not always so straightforward in practice.  Particular problems can occur when you are leasing a part of a property such as a shop unit which is part of a larger building or an office in an office block.  The exact parameters of the property and what’s included must be precise in the lease.  This is especially so when you take on an obligation to repair and maintain the property.  If the precise definition of the property is uncertain then this is a matter where disputes can arise.

3. The lease term.  This must be accurate and most leases have what is called “secure of tenure” which means that the lease can be renewed and some leases have a break clause, meaning that the lease can be brought to an end early upon notice.

4. Rent and rent review.  There is normally a starting rent in the lease which is then reviewed at various agreed points in the future.  Rent review provisions can be complex as there will be possibly several pages of factors that are taken into account to determine how market rent is assessed.  Rent review clauses have to be right as these can be the source of disputes between tenants and landlords.

5. Tenant’s repairs.  You have to be sure that you fully understand what your obligations are in terms of repairing the premises.  

6. Landlord’s repairs.  In some leases landlords are obliged to undertake repairs of certain items but in other leases they only have discretion to do so.  Quite often, although the landlord does repairs, these can be passed to you as the tenant and so it is important for you to understand if and when the costs of potentially very expensive repairs can be passed to you.

7. Assignment and sub-letting.  As a business owner, you will want to have the right to be able to pass on the lease to someone else if, for example, you close down or wanted to sell your business.  The right to assign the lease is rarely unconditional and the landlord can demand fees from you and in some cases you might be required to act as a personal guarantee to a new tenant.

8. Permitted use and alterations to the property.  The lease normally restricts what you can use the property for and whether you have the right to make alterations to it (either structural or non-structural alterations).  

9. Insurance.  Typically there are clauses that deal with insurance that you are required to carry out and what insurance the landlord must maintain.  

10. Service charge.  This is where a landlord provides certain services which you, the tenant, has to pay for.  This could include repairs but also things like maintaining the grounds, surfacing car parks, lighting and cleaning of shared areas.  Sometimes, the landlord can also pass on the costs of employing managing agents.

11. Landlord’s costs.  There are often a list of occasions when the landlord can charge you for costs and expenses such as for enforcing the lease if there is any breach; instructing surveyors to inspect the property; when you are required to have written consent for the landlord for various matters and even for the landlord’s solicitor’s costs for preparing the lease itself.

Examples of common problems with leases:

Dispute over rent review

A typical lease might say that the rent should be reviewed in line with “market rent” every 3, 4 or 5 years.  The problem arises when defining what exactly is a market rent valuation of your premises.  You might, for example, have taken on the premises in a run-down state and invested a lot of money in bringing them up to standard.  You would therefore dispute that the increase in value to the premises that you have paid for through your investment should be taken into account when deciding what a fair market value of the rent is at the time of the rent review.

You would also be aggrieved if the very fact that you are already in the premises and operating a successful business there should be taken into account when deciding what the market rent is.

It is important that the lease is written in such a way that all these issues are clearly defined and fairly balanced between the parties to avoid such disputes.

Repairs to the property

This is a huge source of disputes between landlords and tenants.  There is a stark division between the interests of the landlord and the tenant because the landlord will want the tenant to pay for as much of the repairs as possible, whereas the tenant will want the landlord to bear the costs.

Many unwary tenants are caught out by the clauses in the lease that define what repairs the tenants are responsible for.  A tenant could sign up to a lease and find themselves responsible for repairs that needed doing years before they even took over the property. The ideal for a tenant would be that they would only be responsible for repairs that arose after they took on the lease but if the clauses in the lease don’t properly provide for that then the tenant will be liable for all repairs regardless of when the damage arose and whose fault it was.

Particular items of potential repair that give serious concern include things such as roofs.  A new roof, particular of commercial property, can cost tens of thousands of pounds.  On first glance, a roof might look to be in a reasonable state of repair.  However, it might not in fact be in such a state of repair as it might appear and also you have to remember that if you are taking say a 10-year lease, then you will be liable for repairs over the course of that 10 years.  So for that reason you need to be aware whether any repairs are likely in the future during the term of the lease.

Even if you are only leasing ground floor premises in a building, you could still find yourself liable for the cost of repairs to the roof, depending on what is in your lease.

Service charge disputes

Service charges clauses often look innocuous and at the time that you sign the lease, the landlord might not be claiming much by way of service charge.  However, often a lease gives a landlord a discretion to vastly increase the costs claimed from you under a service charge.  Service charge clauses also often allow for the landlord to employ a managing agent and you could therefore find yourself having professional fees to pay as well.  You should also bear in mind that if there was a change of landlord, in the event that your landlord sold the property, then your new landlord could take a completely different view of the services they provide and expand the cost to you.

Service charges are therefore a very common source of costly dispute between a landlord and tenant and something which needs to be looked at very carefully by your solicitor before you sign up to a lease.

Assignment clauses

You will presumably want your business to be valuable and have the possibility one day of selling it to someone else.  The right under your lease to assign the property to a third party who might be buying your business is therefore very important.  The assignment clause is a source of many disputes between landlords and tenants.  First of all, if there is no assignment clause then you don’t have the right to transfer the lease to any third party.  Secondly, if an assignment clause is written too much in favour of the landlord then the landlord can effectively control whether or not you are able to transfer the lease to somebody else.  You can also find yourself being forced to stand as guarantor to the third party who you want to assign your business to and in that respect you would still be potentially financially liable for the rent.

Therefore, assignment clauses are something that you need to be aware of and fully understand.

What your solicitor does

When you are in the process of taking on a lease the role of your solicitor is as follows:

1. Analyse and advise you on the draft lease.  The draft lease is normally prepared by the landlord’s solicitor and your solicitor’s job is then to very carefully study the lease, identify the implications for you and your business plans and make sure that you are thoroughly advised accordingly.

2. Draft and negotiate any changes.  Where there are parts of the lease that aren’t totally suitable for your purposes, your solicitor’s job is to negotiate with the landlord’s solicitor and make changes to the lease where appropriate.

3. Getting information for you to make an informed choice.  Your solicitor will make a number of enquiries with the landlord’s solicitors to obtain numerous relevant information about the property.  One way this is done is through making what are called standard enquiries which involve over 150 questions being asked under 32 sections.  The solicitor will also ask about such things as insurance and service charge costs, if appropriate.

4. Making formal searches.  These are searches similar to what house buyers will be used to but which are specific to commercial premises.  Commercial searches will not always be strictly necessary and it will be for you to decide which searches you want your solicitor to make.  You can see more information about searches in our separate client guide on this topic.

5. Completing the lease formalities.  This involves getting the lease signed and then co-ordinating with the landlord’s solicitor to agree the precise time and date on which the lease will legally come into effect.  There will then be a physical exchange of leases (which are normally done these days by telephone and post) so that you will end up with physical possession of the lease actually assigned by the landlord.

6. Stamp duty land tax return.  Depending on the amount of rent and length of the term, there might be stamp duty land tax to pay.  Your solicitor will calculate and advise you on what this is.  Whether or not there is any tax to pay, a stamp duty land tax return must be completed and sent to HMRC who then issue a certificate.  Your solicitor will attend to this process.  The stamp duty land tax return certificate must be obtained before registration can be completed.

7. Registration with the Land Registry.  If your lease is for a term of 7 years or more then the lease must be registered with the Land Registry.  Your solicitor will fill out the forms and sort out the formalities of this.  There will also be a fee to pay for to the Land Registry, the level of fee depending on how much the rent is and what the term is.  If a lease is with a term of less than 7 years there is a way that the lease can be registered voluntarily, though most tenants decide not to do so.  Once the application for registration has been sent to the Land Registry, it is not uncommon for the Land Registry to raise enquiries which your solicitor will deal with.  Once the Land Registry is satisfied, they will formally register the lease and issue a document to confirm that.

8. Tying up matters at the end.  Once all of the above steps have been completed, your solicitor will write to you, confirm that everything is completed.  You will be provided with the original lease and documents from the Land Registry confirming that you are the registered owner of that leasehold property.  At this stage the matter is complete.

Simon Newman - January 2019 

For more information about this article or anything else you would like advice on please contact us free on 0800 1777 522.

The Cost of Disruption for Small Businesses
Case Study : Scaffolding Company at Leeds Public I...

Call us for free on 0800 1777 522


Get In Touch Call or fill out the form below

Please let us know your name.
Please let us know your email address.
Please write a subject for your message.
Please let us know your message.
Invalid Input

 


We advise and represent transport businesses throughout the whole of the UK in all parts of England, Scotland, Wales and N.Ireland

Uk





Latest Blogs

It is easy to fall foul of technical aspects of operator licencing. Whether of goods vehicles or passenger service vehicles. One commonly seen relates to disc loaning or licence lending.An operator is...
As with many applications or ‘regulatory’ public inquiries, the Traffic Commissioner (TC) has before her or him a set of papers prepared by their case worker. The fact a public inquiry has been conven...
We were instructed by a business primarily involved in farming and authorised to operate six large goods vehiclesThe public inquiry was called before the Traffic Commissioner to consider the operator’...

Latest Transport Law

Transport Law
It is easy to fall foul of technical aspects of operator licencing. Whether of goods vehicles or passenger service vehicles. One commonly seen relates to disc loaning or licence lending.

An operator is generally not permitted to allow other businesses to ‘use’ the O Licence. And to deliberately do so would likely lead to revocation of the licence, and possible disqualification (perhaps indefinitely) of the legal entity or person behind the licence from holding or even applying for a licence.

Some operators, while not acting with deliberate intent, inadvertently blur the lines of who is ‘using’ or operating the vehicles. One such case was an operator (a limited company) in the North-East traffic area that we represented at the Leeds OTC public inquiry (PI) room.

Our client successfully ran ( and continues to do so) a niche business with highly bespoke heavy goods vehicles. It used several legal entities, including limited companies, to conduct its well-established business. It’s not unfair to say the business model was unusual and complex. (Although the Traffic Commissioner (TC) is not a regulator of businesses, to the extent that matters touch on O Licencing, he/she has regulatory powers to exercise against operators. ) An additional factor was that it involved a restricted licence, meaning that the vehicles could only carry the goods of the entity with the licence.

Without going into all the detail, the operator was using vehicles in such a way that raised the question of whether other legal entities were using the licence, or otherwise unlawfully benefitting from it, and carrying the goods of another entity (Who is the ‘user’ of the vehicle and the true operator can be very complex, and is determined by multiple factors).

We gave our comprehensive legal opinion on all matters that would foreseeably be raised at the hearing. This included urgent advice on an immediate change to how the company was using its vehicles; the company’s maintenance and compliance documentation; and how a different approach would be needed, particularly in respect of brake testing, daily walkarounds and defect reporting/remedying. The company was keen to learn and was receptive to our advice. This involved a site visit, email correspondence, and video-conference/telephone meetings.

All requested maintenance documentation and a business model was submitted in advance to the OTC.

At the hearing the company was able to demonstrate that it was operating vehicles within the authorised parameters. It had learned much in the build-up to the PI and was willing to implement advice - even as late as the day of the PI. The TC conducted a balancing exercise. He concluded there had been a falling-short of O Licence standards in respect of vehicle use and maintenance, and that the company was late to take on professional advice. On the other hand, new systems were in place and dramatic improvements made. OLAT courses had either been booked or completed and the services of a transport consultant were engaged. The almost inevitable regulatory action in this case was limited to a short curtailment involving some vehicles, and undertakings added to the licence. The client considered this a significantly good result considering the consequences of losing the licence or other kinds of regulatory action – which potentially had been on the cards based on the TCs public inquiry brief.
Transport Law
As with many applications or ‘regulatory’ public inquiries, the Traffic Commissioner (TC) has before her or him a set of papers prepared by their case worker. The fact a public inquiry has been convened means there are concerns. The papers alone cannot determine the TCs decision—one way or the other. It is imperative therefore that applicants or licence holders prepare their case thoroughly. If prepared properly, it will help assist the TC to make a favourable decision. If not, the TC may conclude that the case is as it appears on the papers – or even worse.

We recently represented a company that applied for an O Licence (the applicant). The matter was brought to public inquiry because of serious concerns that the new company was either a front for a company that had gone into administration, and/or a phoenix arrangement was taking place; transport manager (TM) considerations; and the application form had not been completed correctly—causing an appreciable misrepresentation of the facts (The simple filling out of the application form is the first opportunity the TC has to see anything about the applicant, including whether they are trustworthy!)

After taking instructions, we could see there was plenty of scope to prepare a strong case for the grant of the application. The applicant’s connection to a company that had gone into administration: any links were tenuous and superficial. There was no phoenix arrangement because there were no substantive connections between the two entities, or relevant individuals. The incorrectly filled-out application form was a genuine error (even though it appeared otherwise).

On the professional competence issue, we advised that a replacement TM was necessary. The originally nominated TM was, in our opinion, not suitable in this case. A TM may have the qualification, but depending on the facts, more is required, including experience, actual knowledge and other capabilities. Our client accepted our advice and contracted another TM, contingent on the grant of the licence.

Most, if not all, of the TCs case directions were fully adhered to. Documentary evidence and representations were submitted two weeks in advance.

Most of the work for the inquiry was completed beforehand. That just left the hearing. We advised on what the hearing would entail and how best to present first-person evidence. Hearings can be particularly stressful, especially if things are left last minute, or not addressed properly. In the end, this hearing was fairly straightforward and relatively short. The TC was satisfied that the evidence submitted adequately addressed concerns. Further evidence and submissions were presented at the hearing. Assurances were given, including a willingness to have conducted an independent audit. As at the date of the hearing, it was clear that the applicant had a good knowledge of O Licence compliance requirements and of their specific kind of haulage work. The application was granted with immediate effect with authorisation for several HGVs.
Transport Law
We were instructed by a business primarily involved in farming and authorised to operate six large goods vehicles

The public inquiry was called before the Traffic Commissioner to consider the operator’s repute. Revocation, suspension, curtailment of the licence, and possible disqualification, were also under consideration (under sections 26(1)(b), 26(c)(iii), 26(e) and 26(f) and 35 of the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995.

Background: the operator (like many operators) had not understood the consequences of changing its legal entity. In this case from a sole trader to limited company. And that, generally, in such circumstances, a licence must be applied for in the name of the new legal entity.

Over the period of some months, the operator had started to run some of the business through the limited company; some thought the sole tradership. Meanwhile, one of its HGVs was stopped by DVSA at a roadside encounter. The vehicle was unfortunately given an ‘S’ marked prohibition for significant failings in its braking system. After questioning the operator, the DVSA concluded that there had been an outright change of legal entity. There were also some other less-significant shortcomings, relating to finances, daily walkaround checks, and paperwork issues .

Together, these were serious failings to overcome at PI. Much would depend on how responsive to our advice the operator and transport manager would be.

We were instructed in good time, and promptly advised on all relevant matters. DVSA had concluded there had been a categoric legal entity change, but we were able to give our opinion on this somewhat nuanced area of law. We advised that this could easily lead to the revocation of the licence, but not necessarily. A robust response would be needed in all areas and any shortcomings remedied as soon as practicably possible.

After several meetings, our client and the TM were clear on what needed to be done before the PI. We also advised on what to expect at the PI itself, including what questions might be asked. The client was responsive and we managed to adhere to the OTC deadlines. During our instructions, other matters emerged—ones not raised in the TCs PI Brief papers. We advised on these also to pre-empt further potential questioning.

The hearing went as near-to-plan as could be expected. The operator and TM were well prepared for the hearing. They were able to fully satisfy the TC on most matters raised. The TC accepted our final submissions that there had never been any attempt to deceive or gain an unfair commercial advantage (there had been no such advantage ) and that any mistakes were inadvertent. We’d submitted supporting evidence in advance.

The simple decision was that the TC curtailed the margin on the licence for two weeks. This resulted in no material disadvantage to the operator. On a balance of probabilities, the TC was satisfied that the business would be compliant as the holder of a goods vehicle operator licence. The effect was that the operator was now in a position to continue using its O’licence without interruption, and run its well-established and successful farming business.